Water For People CEO Challenges Conventional Wisdom and Calls for Transformative Change

Ned Breslin, the outspoken CEO of Water For People, is calling for transformative change in the water and sanitation sector, and he is starting with his own organization.

In his January 2010 essay "Rethinking Hydro‐Philanthropy: Smart Money for Transformative Impact," Breslin outlines key steps that donors, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), local governments and communities should take to create sustainable change with long term benefits.

Expanding upon controversial observations such as those by Nicholas Kristof and David Brooks of the New York Times, Breslin goes where few not-for-profit CEOs dare to go--laying bare all the secrets and shortcomings of today’s charity-based approach in the water and sanitation sector, as well as suggesting guidelines for transformative change.

The essay focuses on his own organization’s shortcomings, providing a first-hand account on what works and what doesn’t work--both short-term and long term. Breslin shows how a well meaning nonprofit like Water For People can move from feel-good, simplistic interpretations and communications on success to a more profound and thoughtful organization that challenges itself by asking far harder, long-term impact questions.

Key points of the report include:

  • Currently, the overriding approach in the sector is of welfare and charity rather than development. This approach leads to poor project implementation which leads to high rates of failure.
  • NGOs must develop the time, patience and understanding of community development to establish the foundation for success.
  • Until now, "sweat equity" has been considered sufficient contribution from communities. But it is not enough to create a sense of ownership to ensure long term success of projects.
  • New philanthropic giving strategies could play a significant role in eliminating water and sanitation poverty by basing themselves on a robust set of sustainability metrics.
  • A new partnership between philanthropists and development agencies needs to focus on leveraging creative philanthropic giving to instill financial responsibilities on communities and governments in developing countries.
  • A new culture of accountability and transparency that transcends what currently masquerades as "reporting" in the sector must emerge.
  • Investors, who employ stringent due diligence when selecting for-profit ventures, should use those same requirements when considering their philanthropic donations.
  • New measurements should go beyond counting number of people served in a given year to include the percentage of projects that are fully functional and self-sufficient at 3, 6 and 10 years.

Please note: This essay focuses on the water and sanitation sector. Certainly, there are other sectors where this would not apply, such as advanced or complex health care. And there are situations, such as humanitarian relief (Eastern Congo) and failed states (Somalia) where this approach would not be appropriate even for the water and sanitation sector.

Read the full essay: http://www.waterforpeople.org/hydrophilanthropy
Follow Ned Breslin’s Blog "Rising Tide": http://www.waterforpeople.org/nedbreslin

Related articles you may be interested in:

How Can We Help the World’s Poor?
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
November 22, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/books/review/Kristof-t.html?_r=1&emc=eta1&pagewanted=print

The Underlying Tragedy
By DAVID BROOKS
Published: January 14, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/opinion/15brooks.html?emc=eta1

Media Opportunities:

  • Interview Ned Bresli
  • Request an exclusive on an article-length excerpt
  • Use the Op-Ed piece as a basis for your own investigative reporting

What do you think?

Full Name:
Organization (if applicable):
Email (will not be published):
Comment:
Enter this word: